Re: [PATCH nfs-utils] rework access to /proc/net/rpc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 09/13/2014 03:05 AM, Timo Teras wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:00:00 -0400
> Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 08/08/2014 02:11 AM, Timo Teräs wrote:
>>> The kernel support only access by read() and write() with exactly
>>> one line in the buffer. FILE can be implemented with readv() and
>>> writev(), and the mapping to syscalls is not guaranteed. The code
>>> already does lot of extra work setvbuf() and fflush() calls to try
>>> to ensure this, but it relays on implementation details and is
>>> non-portable. And e.g. with musl library the current hacks do not
>>> work at all.
>>>
>>> Remove the FILE based qword_* API as it's fundamentally broken,
>>> and replace it with explicitly caching one line at a time. The
>>> qword API should probable improved to do the line caching
>>> internally, and this is the first step towards that.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@xxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> This along with Natanael Copa's patchset makes nfs-utils somewhat
>>> usable with musl c-library.
>> First of all, I apologize for taking so long to get this patch.
>>
>> Second of all, I'm going to NAK this patch because it breaks v3
>> mounts. (Note: this patch was applied after Natanael patchset).
>>
>> Using a Fedora 20 server, Fedora 20 clients fail with 
>>    mount.nfs: Unknown error 521 
>> and Fedora 21 clients fail with 
>>    mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified
> 
> Thanks for the testing and feedback. We had issues with nfs3 on musl
> too and were uncertain if our broke something, or if it's just
> something additional to be fixed.
> 
> Did you test Natanaels patch set individually first? I'm wonderinf
> which patch set breaks nfs3.
Yes, I simply remove this patch and v3 started working again.

> 
>> Also the following warnings occur after the patch is applied:
>>
>> cache.c:128:21: warning: ignoring return value of 'write', declared
>> with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result] cache.c:1495:21:
>> warning: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with attribute
>> warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result] nfssvc.c:71:8: warning: ignoring
>> return value of 'system', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
>> [-Wunused-result] nfssvc.c:325:9: warning: ignoring return value of
>> 'write', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
> 
> My patch seems introduce few of these, but I think some of this come
> from Natanaels patch set.
I didn't see them after I remove your patch....

> 
>> My suggestion is to break the patch up into several small patches
>> which would help with debugging the problem.
> 
> Yes. Might be a good idea.
>  
>> I'll be more than willing to reconsider this change when it
>> stop braking v3 mounts and there are no warnings. 
> 
> Thanks for review, testing and feedback.
> 
np...

steved.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux