sorry, sent out wrong patch. Please ignore this.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Peng Tao <tao.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Both blocks layout and objects layout want to use it to avoid CB_LAYOUTRECALL
> but that should only happen if client is doing chown or truncate. So change
> PNFS_LAYOUTRET_ON_SETATTR to follow the logic and not to send layoutreturn
> unnecessarily.
>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 3 ++-
> fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index 7dd8aca..e55bd0f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -3213,7 +3213,8 @@ nfs4_proc_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct nfs_fattr *fattr,
> struct nfs4_label *label = NULL;
> int status;
>
> - if (pnfs_ld_layoutret_on_setattr(inode))
> + if (pnfs_ld_layoutret_on_setattr(inode) &&
> + sattr->ia_valid & (ATTR_UID|ATTR_GID|ATTR_SIZE))
> pnfs_commit_and_return_layout(inode);
>
> nfs_fattr_init(fattr);
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> index aca3dff..1765ea8 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ enum {
> };
>
> enum layoutdriver_policy_flags {
> - /* Should the pNFS client commit and return the layout upon a setattr */
> + /* Should the pNFS client commit and return the layout upon a setattr
> + * that changes uid/gid/size. */
> PNFS_LAYOUTRET_ON_SETATTR = 1 << 0,
> PNFS_LAYOUTRET_ON_ERROR = 1 << 1,
> };
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
