On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:24:04PM +0800, Peng Tao wrote: > The reason I didn't add it was because PNFS_LAYOUTRET_ON_SETATTR is > too much for blocks layout. What we really want is to return layouts > on truncate and chown, instead of _all_ setattr requests. > > Boaz, does object layout require return on setattr for other reasons? > If not, I'd suggest we change PNFS_LAYOUTRET_ON_SETATTR to return only > on chown/truncate events. I was actually going to ask the same question, I can't see a point why the object layout driver would want it on any other setattr. In fact it could probably be narrowed down to chown or truncate to a smaller size. I'd also love to know why we don't want to do this for the filelayout driver. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
