Re: [PATCH] nfsd4: fix rd_dircount enforcement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:55 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Commit 3b299709091b "nfsd4: enforce rd_dircount" totally misunderstood
> rd_dircount; it refers to total non-attribute bytes returned, not number
> of directory entries returned.
>
> Bring the code into agreement with RFC 3530 section 14.2.24.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> index f9821ce6658a..e94457c33ad6 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> @@ -2657,6 +2657,7 @@ nfsd4_encode_dirent(void *ccdv, const char *name, int namlen,
>         struct xdr_stream *xdr = cd->xdr;
>         int start_offset = xdr->buf->len;
>         int cookie_offset;
> +       u32 name_and_cookie;
>         int entry_bytes;
>         __be32 nfserr = nfserr_toosmall;
>         __be64 wire_offset;
> @@ -2718,7 +2719,14 @@ nfsd4_encode_dirent(void *ccdv, const char *name, int namlen,
>         cd->rd_maxcount -= entry_bytes;
>         if (!cd->rd_dircount)
>                 goto fail;
> -       cd->rd_dircount--;
> +       /*
> +        * RFC 3530 14.2.24 describes rd_dircount as only a "hint", so
> +        * let's always let through the first entry, at least:
> +        */
> +       name_and_cookie = 4 * XDR_QUADLEN(namlen) + 8;
> +       if (name_and_cookie > cd->rd_dircount && cd->cookie_offset)
> +               goto fail;
> +       cd->rd_dircount -= min(cd->rd_dircount, name_and_cookie);
>         cd->cookie_offset = cookie_offset;
>  skip_entry:
>         cd->common.err = nfs_ok;
> @@ -3321,6 +3329,10 @@ nfsd4_encode_readdir(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp, __be32 nfserr, struct nfsd4
>         }
>         maxcount = min_t(int, maxcount-16, bytes_left);
>
> +       /* RFC 3530 14.2.24 allows us to ignore dircount when it's 0: */
> +       if (!readdir->rd_dircount)
> +               readdir->rd_dircount = INT_MAX;
> +

Ah... Time to change the Linux client to always set this value to 0.
It really is useless in our case.


-- 
Trond Myklebust

Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData

trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux