On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:17:24AM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > > To catch the intent - the first two clauses find excuses why we can't return > > quite yet, while this if is for an optional feature in the actual return > > path. If I wasn't updating but newly writing the function I'd actually > > do something like: > > I'm a fan of nice looking code, and I like what you have below better. Can you arrange things to end up in this state? Or maybe send a cleanup patch after? I'll send a cleanup later, that is unless I need to respin the series in this area anyway for Boaz different layoutcommit on recall proposal. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
