Re: [PATCH 04/11] SUNRPC: Do not override wspace tests in svc_handle_xprt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 01:03:06PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> We already determined that there was enough wspace when we
> called svc_xprt_enqueue.

So xpo_has_wspace may have returned true then, but I don't see what
guarantees it still would now.  Couldn't another server thread have also
run svc_recv() and the atomic_add(rqstp->rq_reserved,
&xprt->xpt_reserved) between the svc_xprt_enqueue call and now?

--b.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> index 32647b2a6a34..b731077b6a30 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ static int svc_handle_xprt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_xprt *xprt)
>  			svc_add_new_temp_xprt(serv, newxpt);
>  		else
>  			module_put(xprt->xpt_class->xcl_owner);
> -	} else if (xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_has_wspace(xprt)) {
> +	} else {
>  		/* XPT_DATA|XPT_DEFERRED case: */
>  		dprintk("svc: server %p, pool %u, transport %p, inuse=%d\n",
>  			rqstp, rqstp->rq_pool->sp_id, xprt,
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux