[PATCH] nfs: Don't busy-wait on SIGKILL in __nfs_iocounter_wait

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If a SIGKILL is sent to a task waiting in __nfs_iocounter_wait,
it will busy-wait or soft lockup in its while loop.
nfs_wait_bit_killable won't sleep, and the loop won't exit on
the error return.  

Stop the busy-wait by breaking out of the loop when
nfs_wait_bit_killable returns an error.

Signed-off-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
I'm not completely confident this is the right solution. I
would like feedback if the intention was to break out of
this loop on error, or if we do need to wait here until
io_count hits zero and use something other than
nfs_wait_bit_killable to wait in case of SIGKILL.

 pagelist.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
index 17fab89..f29a690 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ __nfs_iocounter_wait(struct nfs_io_counter *c)
 		if (atomic_read(&c->io_count) == 0)
 			break;
 		ret = nfs_wait_bit_killable(&c->flags);
-	} while (atomic_read(&c->io_count) != 0);
+	} while (atomic_read(&c->io_count) != 0 && !ret);
 	finish_wait(wq, &q.wait);
 	return ret;
 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux