On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:50:29AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > I'm not convinced it is. But I understand that we're imposing a weird > assumption on the lock interface: "if you're exportable, you should use > the struct file we passed you only to get the inode". We might as well stick with the old variant for now. It's defintively asking for trouble, but so far it worked.. I'll look into refactoring the locking code so that it doesn't need the file instead. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html