From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The way stateowners are managed today is somewhat awkward. They need to
be explicitly destroyed, even though the stateids reference them. This
will be particularly problematic when we remove the client_mutex.
We may create a new stateowner and attempt to open a file or set a lock,
and have that fail. In the meantime, another RPC may come in that uses
that same stateowner and succeed. We can't have the first task tearing
down the stateowner in that situation.
To fix this, we need to change how stateowners are tracked altogether.
Refcount them and only destroy them once all stateids that reference
them have been destroyed. This patch starts by adding the refcounting
necessary to do that.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
fs/nfsd/state.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 9ac1cd37e233..3c998ff64fbb 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static u64 current_sessionid = 1;
/* forward declarations */
static int check_for_locks(struct nfs4_file *filp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner);
static void nfs4_free_generic_stateid(struct nfs4_stid *stid);
+static void nfs4_put_stateowner(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop);
/* Locking: */
@@ -962,16 +963,10 @@ static void unhash_lockowner(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo)
}
}
-static void nfs4_free_lockowner(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo)
-{
- kfree(lo->lo_owner.so_owner.data);
- kmem_cache_free(lockowner_slab, lo);
-}
-
static void release_lockowner(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo)
{
unhash_lockowner(lo);
- nfs4_free_lockowner(lo);
+ nfs4_put_stateowner(&lo->lo_owner);
}
static void release_lockowner_if_empty(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo)
@@ -1041,18 +1036,12 @@ static void release_last_closed_stateid(struct nfs4_openowner *oo)
}
}
-static void nfs4_free_openowner(struct nfs4_openowner *oo)
-{
- kfree(oo->oo_owner.so_owner.data);
- kmem_cache_free(openowner_slab, oo);
-}
-
static void release_openowner(struct nfs4_openowner *oo)
{
unhash_openowner(oo);
list_del(&oo->oo_close_lru);
release_last_closed_stateid(oo);
- nfs4_free_openowner(oo);
+ nfs4_put_stateowner(&oo->oo_owner);
}
static inline int
@@ -2986,9 +2975,17 @@ static inline void *alloc_stateowner(struct kmem_cache *slab, struct xdr_netobj
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sop->so_stateids);
sop->so_client = clp;
init_nfs4_replay(&sop->so_replay);
+ atomic_set(&sop->so_count, 1);
return sop;
}
+static void nfs4_put_stateowner(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop)
+{
+ if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&sop->so_count))
+ return;
+ sop->so_free(sop);
+}
+
static void hash_openowner(struct nfs4_openowner *oo, struct nfs4_client *clp, unsigned int strhashval)
{
struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(clp->net, nfsd_net_id);
@@ -2997,6 +2994,14 @@ static void hash_openowner(struct nfs4_openowner *oo, struct nfs4_client *clp, u
list_add(&oo->oo_perclient, &clp->cl_openowners);
}
+static void nfs4_free_openowner(struct nfs4_stateowner *so)
+{
+ struct nfs4_openowner *oo = openowner(so);
+
+ kfree(oo->oo_owner.so_owner.data);
+ kmem_cache_free(openowner_slab, oo);
+}
+
static struct nfs4_openowner *
alloc_init_open_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate)
@@ -3007,6 +3012,7 @@ alloc_init_open_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfsd4_open *open,
oo = alloc_stateowner(openowner_slab, &open->op_owner, clp);
if (!oo)
return NULL;
+ oo->oo_owner.so_free = nfs4_free_openowner;
oo->oo_owner.so_is_open_owner = 1;
oo->oo_owner.so_seqid = open->op_seqid;
oo->oo_flags = NFS4_OO_NEW;
@@ -4719,6 +4725,14 @@ find_lockowner_str(clientid_t *clid, struct xdr_netobj *owner,
return NULL;
}
+static void nfs4_free_lockowner(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop)
+{
+ struct nfs4_lockowner *lo = lockowner(sop);
+
+ kfree(lo->lo_owner.so_owner.data);
+ kmem_cache_free(lockowner_slab, lo);
+}
+
/*
* Alloc a lock owner structure.
* Called in nfsd4_lock - therefore, OPEN and OPEN_CONFIRM (if needed) has
@@ -4739,6 +4753,7 @@ alloc_init_lock_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfs4_client *clp, str
/* It is the openowner seqid that will be incremented in encode in the
* case of new lockowners; so increment the lock seqid manually: */
lo->lo_owner.so_seqid = lock->lk_new_lock_seqid + 1;
+ lo->lo_owner.so_free = nfs4_free_lockowner;
list_add(&lo->lo_owner.so_strhash, &nn->ownerstr_hashtbl[strhashval]);
return lo;
}
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/state.h b/fs/nfsd/state.h
index 7188dcd45ef7..eba7283a2613 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/state.h
+++ b/fs/nfsd/state.h
@@ -340,10 +340,13 @@ struct nfs4_stateowner {
struct nfs4_client * so_client;
/* after increment in ENCODE_SEQID_OP_TAIL, represents the next
* sequence id expected from the client: */
+ atomic_t so_count;
u32 so_seqid;
struct xdr_netobj so_owner; /* open owner name */
struct nfs4_replay so_replay;
bool so_is_open_owner;
+
+ void (*so_free)(struct nfs4_stateowner *);
};
struct nfs4_openowner {
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
