Re: Is there a good reason that nfs4_state_manager should use a work_queue?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:21:00PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>  2/ would it be reasonable to have a single work queue for all nfs clients?
>     In the worst case this could serialise reclaim across all clients so we
>     wouldn't want any reclaim attempt to block indefinitely.  Is that likely
>     to be a big problem do you think?

A workqueue isn't serialized, it has a max_active paramater to control
the concurrency of execution.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux