Re: [PATCH v1 005/104] NFSd: Add fine grained protection for the nfs4_file->fi_stateids list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:24:58PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:23:32 -0700
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:20:39PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > Correct. I'll add that into the desciption if you think it's warranted,
> > > but again that's the case with many of the patches in this series.
> > 
> > It might be fairly obvious in the context of the series, it's not
> > if someone goes back in history with a git-blame.
> > 
> > And it's not a 100% obvious with the series either, at least earlier
> > versions also fixes pre-existing races, although all of that might be
> > upstream now.
> > 
> > So as far as I am concerned a simple one-line blurb mentioning what
> > the new locking is for would be useful to be added to all patches
> > just changing the locking.
> 
> Fair enough. I'll do that.

I appreciate that it's tedious but yes, thanks, that would be helpful.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux