Re: [PATCH 0/3] NFS: Fix SECINFO processing regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 06/09/2014 03:33 PM, andros@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Iterate over multiple flavors returned by SECINFO. If RPC_AUTH_GSS is in the
> secinfo list, fully test (get and auth, credential, and gss_context)
> 
> Fix some error paths.
> 
> Testing: Minimal testing of the nfs_test_gss_flavor. Will run more tests after
> the June 2014 bakeathon
> 
> Note: Can supply a patch for SECINFO_NO_name to use nfs4_negotiate_security.
> 
> Andy Adamson (3):
>   NFS check the return of nfs4_negotiate_security in nfs4_submount
>   NFS Return -EPERM if no supported or matching SECINFO flavor
>   NFS test SECINFO RPC_AUTH_GSS pseudoflavors for support
> 
>  fs/nfs/nfs4namespace.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
Tested-By: Steve Dickson <steved@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux