From: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx> Do not return RPC_AUTH_UNIX if SEINFO reply tests fail. This prevents an infinite loop of NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC for non RPC_AUTH_UNIX mounts. Without this patch, a mount with no sec= option to a server that does not include RPC_AUTH_UNIX in the SECINFO return can be presented with an attemtp to use RPC_AUTH_UNIX which will result in an NFS4ERR_WRONG_SEC which will prompt the SECINFO call which will again try RPC_AUTH_UNIX.... Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfs/nfs4namespace.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4namespace.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4namespace.c index 1b86fef..fd4dcb6 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4namespace.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4namespace.c @@ -140,10 +140,11 @@ static size_t nfs_parse_server_name(char *string, size_t len, * @flavors: List of security tuples returned by SECINFO procedure * * Return the pseudoflavor of the first security mechanism in - * "flavors" that is locally supported. Return RPC_AUTH_UNIX if - * no matching flavor is found in the array. The "flavors" array + * "flavors" that is locally supported. The "flavors" array * is searched in the order returned from the server, per RFC 3530 * recommendation. + * + * Return -EPERM if no matching flavor is found in the array. */ static rpc_authflavor_t nfs_find_best_sec(struct nfs_server *server, struct nfs4_secinfo_flavors *flavors) @@ -170,11 +171,7 @@ static rpc_authflavor_t nfs_find_best_sec(struct nfs_server *server, } } - /* if there were any sec= options then nothing matched */ - if (server->auth_info.flavor_len > 0) - return -EPERM; - - return RPC_AUTH_UNIX; + return -EPERM; } static rpc_authflavor_t nfs4_negotiate_security(struct inode *inode, struct qstr *name) -- 1.8.3.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
