Re: WARN_ON_ONCE pop with tip of your nfsd-next branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 09:51:09PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
> 
> Just a heads up...
> 
> Was doing some testing with a pile of patches (mostly v4 state-related)
> on top of your nfsd-next branch, and saw this pop:

Do you know exactly was the commit id of the last commit from my branch?

--b.

> 
> [  111.066217] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  111.067223] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 588 at fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c:3941 nfs4svc_encode_compoundres+0x9a/0xb0 [nfsd]()
> [  111.070074] Modules linked in: rpcsec_gss_krb5 snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel snd_hda_controller snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm ppdev joydev snd_timer microcode serio_raw snd virtio_console virtio_balloon virtio_net pcspkr soundcore parport_pc parport pvpanic nfsd(OE) i2c_piix4 auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd sunrpc qxl drm_kms_helper ttm virtio_blk drm virtio_pci virtio_ring i2c_core virtio ata_generic pata_acpi floppy
> [  111.081001] CPU: 0 PID: 588 Comm: nfsd Tainted: G           OE 3.15.0-rc1.jlayton.1+ #2
> [  111.083615] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> [  111.084924]  0000000000000000 00000000051421a7 ffff8800d6c3dcf0 ffffffff817d318e
> [  111.086613]  0000000000000000 ffff8800d6c3dd28 ffffffff810958bd ffff88003602d000
> [  111.088308]  ffff8800d8880000 ffff880118fb4018 ffff880118fb4000 000000000000001c
> [  111.089978] Call Trace:
> [  111.090552]  [<ffffffff817d318e>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66
> [  111.091652]  [<ffffffff810958bd>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0
> [  111.092927]  [<ffffffff810959ea>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [  111.094189]  [<ffffffffa018d91a>] nfs4svc_encode_compoundres+0x9a/0xb0 [nfsd]
> [  111.095565]  [<ffffffffa016cf5f>] nfsd_dispatch+0x14f/0x200 [nfsd]
> [  111.096915]  [<ffffffffa00f2bd0>] svc_process_common+0x480/0x6f0 [sunrpc]
> [  111.098228]  [<ffffffffa00f2f47>] svc_process+0x107/0x170 [sunrpc]
> [  111.099898]  [<ffffffffa016c253>] nfsd+0xd3/0x160 [nfsd]
> [  111.100971]  [<ffffffffa016c180>] ? nfsd_destroy+0x210/0x210 [nfsd]
> [  111.102219]  [<ffffffff810c260f>] kthread+0xff/0x120
> [  111.103185]  [<ffffffff810c2510>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x80/0x80
> [  111.104345]  [<ffffffff817e6bfc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> [  111.105376]  [<ffffffff810c2510>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x80/0x80
> [  111.106476] ---[ end trace 48ac61da47c8e691 ]---
> 
> It's possible that it's due to something I broke, but seems more likely
> to be something in your XDR overhaul.
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux