> -----Original Message----- > From: Bart Van Assche [mailto:bvanassche@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 2:23 AM > To: Steve Wise; bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH] svcrdma: Fence LOCAL_INV work requests > > On 06/02/14 19:14, Steve Wise wrote: > > Fencing forces the invalidate to only happen after all subsequent send > > work requests have been completed. > > Shouldn't that read "prior" instead of "subsequent" ? > Yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
