On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Shirley Ma <shirley.ma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 06/03/2014 10:53 AM, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Anna Schumaker >> <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I pulled from Chuck's branch earlier today before sending this. He has all the date stamps set as June 2. >>> >> >> OK, this is broken and I'm not pulling. The point of asking you to >> maintain the tree was to ensure that the patches get reviewed by you, >> and that I have signed-off-bys etc showing that is the case. > > Thanks Trond for checking. Where was broken? What we can help here? Hi Shirley, I meant that the process was broken, since I was losing the information about what Anna had reviewed and so the issue was how to fix that. I've now talked to Chuck and Anna and we've set up a model for how to work together in the future: the model I'd like to see is for Anna to publish a branch of patches that she has reviewed, with the signed-off-by line. That way I know that the contents are the exact same patches that were approved on the mailing lists. Cheers Trond >>> On 06/03/2014 12:44 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Anna Schumaker >>>> <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Hey Trond, >>>>> >>>>> The following changes since commit fad01e866afdbe01a1f3ec06a39c3a8b9e197014: >>>>> >>>>> Linux 3.15-rc8 (2014-06-01 19:12:24 -0700) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Did you rebase these? All the commits appear to be labeled with >>>> today's date, and Chuck appears as the committer for all of them. >>>> >>> > > Shirley > -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
