On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:18:34AM -0400, Weston Andros Adamson wrote: > On May 28, 2014, at 10:23 AM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There's not much point re-running all the 4.1 tests over 4.2. Maybe all > > we may need is to say "use minor version 2 on this compound" in tests of > > the new features. > > > > But I haven't even tried to figure out how to tell pynfs about the new > > .x files. > > I’ve made a lot of pynfs cleanups recently - mostly on the client test side > (the nfs4.1 server), but they may make this a bit easier. I’ll clean them up > and share asap. > > I was just adding new xdr to pynfs and AFAIK it's xdrgen has no include > support, so we’re stuck tacking things on the end of nfs4.x. Would it be > worthwhile for me to add some type of include support? Minor versions and > layouts could stay in separate .x files - that sounds much cleaner to me. That does sound cleaner, but is that how the ietf's .x files work? It looks like http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-26.txt just copies all the 4.1 definitions. I may not understand what you're proposing. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
