On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 21:46 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:49:05AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > > > > On 03/20/2014 03:33 AM, Noam Meltzer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Simo Sorce <simo@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:simo@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 13:25 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:58:59PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 11:24 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > V4 servers now have an option of returning a uid string (aka "3606") > > > > > > where the NFS client just converts that into the uid. > > > > > > > > > > Can the client tell the server *not to do that* ? > > > > > > > > The client can use kerberos, in which case the server won't do that. > > > > > > This is sufficient, thanks. > > > > > > > Other than that, no, the behavior can only be controlled by server-side > > > > configuration. > > > > > > A little sub-optimal if the server can do either but the client can have > > > a choice, but ok. > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the late response. A misplaced email filtering rule had moved it away from my inbox. > > > How can we push this forward? > > > > > Not sure since I don't maintain any of the code these patches change... > > > > steved. > > Does the code work with the current NFS idmap implementation or are > there any changes on either side needed? > > Simo, are there still any issues that would prevent us from merging the > code into SSSD? I am not aware of any issue, but I have not found any time to do any testing, sorry :-/ Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
