Re: [PATCH 01/52] nfsd4: READ, READDIR, etc., are idempotent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 09:21:38AM +0800, Kinglong Mee wrote:
> On 5/23/2014 03:31, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING flags operations that we should be careful not to
> > initiate without being sure we have the buffer space to encode a reply.
> > 
> > None of these ops fall into that category.
> > 
> > We could probably remove a few more, but this isn't a very important
> > problem at least for ops whose reply size is easy to estimate.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 13 +++----------
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> > index ac83778..4c4cd96 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
> > @@ -1665,38 +1665,31 @@ static struct nfsd4_operation nfsd4_ops[] = {
> >  	[OP_PUTFH] = {
> >  		.op_func = (nfsd4op_func)nfsd4_putfh,
> >  		.op_flags = ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS
> > -				| OP_IS_PUTFH_LIKE | OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING
> > -				| OP_CLEAR_STATEID,
> > +				| OP_IS_PUTFH_LIKE | OP_CLEAR_STATEID,
> >  		.op_name = "OP_PUTFH",
> >  		.op_rsize_bop = (nfsd4op_rsize)nfsd4_only_status_rsize,
> >  	},
> >  	[OP_PUTPUBFH] = {
> >  		.op_func = (nfsd4op_func)nfsd4_putrootfh,
> >  		.op_flags = ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS
> > -				| OP_IS_PUTFH_LIKE | OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING
> > -				| OP_CLEAR_STATEID,
> > +				| OP_IS_PUTFH_LIKE | OP_CLEAR_STATEID,
> >  		.op_name = "OP_PUTPUBFH",
> >  		.op_rsize_bop = (nfsd4op_rsize)nfsd4_only_status_rsize,
> >  	},
> >  	[OP_PUTROOTFH] = {
> >  		.op_func = (nfsd4op_func)nfsd4_putrootfh,
> >  		.op_flags = ALLOWED_WITHOUT_FH | ALLOWED_ON_ABSENT_FS
> > -				| OP_IS_PUTFH_LIKE | OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING
> > -				| OP_CLEAR_STATEID,
> > +				| OP_IS_PUTFH_LIKE | OP_CLEAR_STATEID,
> >  		.op_name = "OP_PUTROOTFH",
> >  		.op_rsize_bop = (nfsd4op_rsize)nfsd4_only_status_rsize,
> >  	},
> >  	[OP_READ] = {
> >  		.op_func = (nfsd4op_func)nfsd4_read,
> > -		.op_flags = OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING,
> > -		.op_name = "OP_READ",
> 
> Should not delete op_name.
> 
> >  		.op_rsize_bop = (nfsd4op_rsize)nfsd4_read_rsize,
> >  		.op_get_currentstateid = (stateid_getter)nfsd4_get_readstateid,
> >  	},
> >  	[OP_READDIR] = {
> >  		.op_func = (nfsd4op_func)nfsd4_readdir,
> > -		.op_flags = OP_MODIFIES_SOMETHING,
> > -		.op_name = "OP_READDIR",
> 
> Same as above.
> 
> Because "[PATCH 03/52] nfsd4: fill in some missing op_name's" re-adds them.

Good grief--I should have checked when those op_name's diseappeared
before making the new patch.  Thanks.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux