Re: [PATCH 10/70] NFSd: Avoid taking state_lock while holding inode lock in nfsd_break_one_deleg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 02:44:04PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> state_lock is a heavily contended global lock. We don't want to grab
> that while simultaneously holding the inode->i_lock
> Instead do the list manipulations from the work queue context prior to
> starting the rpc call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c    | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
>  fs/nfsd/state.h        |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
> index 39c8ef875f91..8626cd6af4d1 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
> @@ -1009,9 +1009,8 @@ static void nfsd4_process_cb_update(struct nfsd4_callback *cb)
>  		run_nfsd4_cb(cb);
>  }
>  
> -static void nfsd4_do_callback_rpc(struct work_struct *w)
> +static void nfsd4_run_callback_rpc(struct nfsd4_callback *cb)
>  {
> -	struct nfsd4_callback *cb = container_of(w, struct nfsd4_callback, cb_work);
>  	struct nfs4_client *clp = cb->cb_clp;
>  	struct rpc_clnt *clnt;
>  
> @@ -1029,11 +1028,25 @@ static void nfsd4_do_callback_rpc(struct work_struct *w)
>  			cb->cb_ops, cb);
>  }
>  
> +static void nfsd4_do_callback_rpc(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> +	struct nfsd4_callback *cb = container_of(w, struct nfsd4_callback, cb_work);
> +	nfsd4_run_callback_rpc(cb);
> +}
> +
>  void nfsd4_init_callback(struct nfsd4_callback *cb)
>  {
>  	INIT_WORK(&cb->cb_work, nfsd4_do_callback_rpc);
>  }
>  
> +static void nfsd4_do_cb_recall(struct work_struct *w)
> +{
> +	struct nfsd4_callback *cb = container_of(w, struct nfsd4_callback, cb_work);
> +
> +	nfsd4_prepare_cb_recall(cb->cb_op);
> +	nfsd4_run_callback_rpc(cb);
> +}
> +
>  void nfsd4_cb_recall(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
>  {
>  	struct nfsd4_callback *cb = &dp->dl_recall;
> @@ -1050,6 +1063,7 @@ void nfsd4_cb_recall(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cb->cb_per_client);
>  	cb->cb_done = true;
> +	INIT_WORK(&cb->cb_work, nfsd4_do_cb_recall);
>  
>  	run_nfsd4_cb(&dp->dl_recall);
>  }
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 6d691aa2bb27..85fcbc9ebd40 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -2743,24 +2743,31 @@ out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void nfsd_break_one_deleg(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> +void nfsd4_prepare_cb_recall(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
>  {
>  	struct nfs4_client *clp = dp->dl_stid.sc_client;
>  	struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(clp->net, nfsd_net_id);
>  
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&state_lock);
> +	/*
> +	 * We can't do this in nfsd_break_deleg_cb because it is
> +	 * already holding inode->i_lock
> +	 */
> +	spin_lock(&state_lock);
> +	if (list_empty(&dp->dl_recall_lru)) {
> +		dp->dl_time = get_seconds();
> +		list_add_tail(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &nn->del_recall_lru);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&state_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void nfsd_break_one_deleg(struct nfs4_delegation *dp)
> +{
>  	/* We're assuming the state code never drops its reference
>  	 * without first removing the lease.  Since we're in this lease
>  	 * callback (and since the lease code is serialized by the kernel
>  	 * lock) we know the server hasn't removed the lease yet, we know
>  	 * it's safe to take a reference: */
>  	atomic_inc(&dp->dl_count);
> -
> -	list_add_tail(&dp->dl_recall_lru, &nn->del_recall_lru);
> -
> -	/* Only place dl_time is set; protected by i_lock: */
> -	dp->dl_time = get_seconds();
> -
>  	nfsd4_cb_recall(dp);
>  }
>  
> @@ -2785,11 +2792,9 @@ static void nfsd_break_deleg_cb(struct file_lock *fl)
>  	 */
>  	fl->fl_break_time = 0;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&state_lock);
>  	fp->fi_had_conflict = true;
>  	list_for_each_entry(dp, &fp->fi_delegations, dl_perfile)
>  		nfsd_break_one_deleg(dp);
> -	spin_unlock(&state_lock);

Why do we know it's safe to traverse this list without holding
state_lock?

--b.

>  }
>  
>  static
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/state.h b/fs/nfsd/state.h
> index 1aa22f39fc65..02c5a203c738 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/state.h
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/state.h
> @@ -473,6 +473,7 @@ extern void nfsd4_cb_recall(struct nfs4_delegation *dp);
>  extern int nfsd4_create_callback_queue(void);
>  extern void nfsd4_destroy_callback_queue(void);
>  extern void nfsd4_shutdown_callback(struct nfs4_client *);
> +extern void nfsd4_prepare_cb_recall(struct nfs4_delegation *dp);
>  extern void nfs4_put_delegation(struct nfs4_delegation *dp);
>  extern struct nfs4_client_reclaim *nfs4_client_to_reclaim(const char *name,
>  							struct nfsd_net *nn);
> -- 
> 1.9.0
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux