Thanks for the reply, Bruce. > Are you using UDP or TCP? TCP. > And what do you mean by "maximum packet size"? I'm generally referring to the Frame size (e.g. 32,626) and/or the TCP packet size (e.g. 32560) - The former being the size of the latter plus the ethernet/IP headers. > To see if the maximum rsize/wsize is being used you'd need to look for > the length of the data in a READ reply or WRITE call. Right. When I check the contents of a WRITE RPC, I see "Data" length of 32768 (32k). My understanding is that setting {r,w}size doesn't guarantee that will be the agreed-upon value. Apparently one must check the value in /proc. I have verified this by checking the value of /proc/XXXX/mounts, where XXXX is the pid for nfsv4.0-svc on the client. It is set to a value >32K. > What actual problem are you trying to solve? (Is your read or write > bandwidth lower than you expected?) I am trying to maximize throughout within a parallel processing cluster. We have GigE connections within our closed network and I would like to ensure we are fully utilizing our bandwidth. Additionally, I find a lot of information online (that is not outdated) suggests various Kernel/OS/NFS settings without giving details for why the settings should be modified. Upon changing the rsize/wsize, I would have expected to see a change in the packet/payload size, but I do not. -Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html