On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 11:09:58AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Feb 5, 2014, at 8:27 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I certainly agree with making things simple. If we can make a configuration
> > irrelevant, e.g. by gets nfsd to auto-tune the number of threads so the
> > setting becomes pointless, then I've very happy to remove that sort of
> > configuration. But if a configuration option actually means something I
> > certainly don't want to remove it.
> >
> > So I'm leaning towards having "systemctl {un,}mask rpc-gssd" be the
> > configuration tool for rpc.gssd.
>
> I like that better than the “off-until-requested” behavior we have currently. IMO folks who want to disable rpc.gssd will be in the increasing minority and the rest of the world will take scant notice of the extra daemon, as long as we ensure it speaks only when necessary.
I'd also prefer running the gssd's by default: one less (confusing) step
to set up kerberos, and I'm not seeing a realistic security risk.
If we can easily provide a way to turn it off for people that want a
really stripped-down system for whatever reason, fine, let's provide
that.
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
