On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 06:07:28PM +0800, shaobingqing wrote: > In the current code, extents would not delete from the bl_extents list when > lseg is removed from layout. Now one extent's lseg is deleted and its type > is PNFS_BLOCK_NONE_DATA, while a layoutget request get a extent with the same > range and its type is PNFS_BLOCK_NONE_DATA. In this situation the function > bl_add_merge_extent will return -EIO. Furthermore, the READ op which request > the layout will be execute in band. This perhaps not only degrade performance, > but also result in data unconsistency. I think the right fix is to remove the extent when the lseg is removed. I can't see how the current pnfs block client could work in the case where a file is first truncated and then later written into again. This should be easily reproducable using fsx, btw. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html