On 16/01/14 12:31, Chuck Lever wrote: > I was reminded recently that NFS treats file atime time stamps > differently than other filesystems. It also ignores the generic > *atime mount options because it cannot support the atime semantics > of local filesystems. > > We should document that somewhere. nfs(5) seems like a logical > place for it. > > Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> I'm a bit confused... What is the different between this patch and the one you posted back in Nov 18 http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg40559.html which turned to commit commit f41c591f8f4d492ee84994bb86810fb90bef8d4b Author: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed Nov 20 14:10:06 2013 -0500 steved. > --- > utils/mount/nfs.man | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/utils/mount/nfs.man b/utils/mount/nfs.man > index 67031b5..2250963 100644 > --- a/utils/mount/nfs.man > +++ b/utils/mount/nfs.man > @@ -1227,6 +1227,65 @@ If absolute cache coherence among clients is required, > applications should use file locking. Alternatively, applications > can also open their files with the O_DIRECT flag > to disable data caching entirely. > +.SS "File timestamp maintainence" > +NFS servers are responsible for managing file and directory timestamps > +.RB ( atime , > +.BR ctime ", and" > +.BR mtime ). > +When a file is accessed or updated on an NFS server, > +the file's timestamps are updated just like they would be on a filesystem > +local to an application. > +.P > +NFS clients cache file attributes, including timestamps. > +A file's timestamps are updated on NFS clients when its attributes > +are retrieved from the NFS server. > +Thus there may be some delay before timestamp updates > +on an NFS server appear to applications on NFS clients. > +.P > +To comply with the POSIX filesystem standard, the Linux NFS client > +relies on NFS servers to keep a file's > +.B mtime > +and > +.B ctime > +timestamps properly up to date. > +It does this by flushing local data changes to the server > +before reporting > +.B mtime > +to applications via system calls such as > +.BR stat (2). > +.P > +The Linux client handles > +.B atime > +updates more loosely, however. > +NFS clients maintain good performance by caching data, > +but that means that application reads, which normally update > +.BR atime , > +are not reflected to the server where a file's > +.B atime > +is actually maintained. > +.P > +Because of this caching behavior, > +the Linux NFS client does not support generic atime-related mount options. > +See > +.BR mount (8) > +for details on these options. > +.P > +In particular, the > +.BR atime / noatime , > +.BR diratime / nodiratime , > +.BR relatime / norelatime , > +and > +.BR strictatime / nostrictatime > +mount options have no effect on NFS mounts. > +.P > +.I /proc/mounts > +may report that the > +.B relatime > +mount option is set on NFS mounts, but in fact the > +.B atime > +semantics are always as described here, and are not like > +.B relatime > +semantics. > .SS "Directory entry caching" > The Linux NFS client caches the result of all NFS LOOKUP requests. > If the requested directory entry exists on the server, > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
