On Jan 16, 2014, at 12:20, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2014, at 12:09, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> How about something like this?
>>
>> We really want something in the acregmin/max, acdirmin/max descriptions that refers to the cache coherency discussion too.
>
> “noac” now has:
>
> The DATA AND METADATA COHERENCE section contains a
> detailed discussion of these trade-offs.
>
> “lookupcache” has:
>
> The DATA AND METADATA COHERENCE section contains a
> detailed discussion of these trade-offs.
>
> And “cto” has:
>
> server changes only occasionally. The DATA AND METADATA
> COHERENCE section discusses the behavior of this option
> in more detail.
>
> We can add this to ac{reg,dir}{min,max}:
>
> See the DATA AND METADATA COHERENCE section for a full
> discussion of attribute caching.
>
> Is that what you were thinking?
Yes, that should be sufficient.
Thanks!
Trond--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
