On Jan 13, 2014, at 8:34, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2014, at 2:55, shaobingqing <shaobingqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> When a file is in NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITING status, its isize perhaps has not been >> transferred to the metadate server. So the isize getting from the metadata server >> perhaps is out of date and cannot be used to update the isize of the client. >> >> Signed-off-by: shaobingqing <shaobingqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/nfs/inode.c | 3 ++- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c >> index ebeb94c..caf50a1 100644 >> --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c >> +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c >> @@ -1402,7 +1402,8 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr) >> if (new_isize != cur_isize) { >> /* Do we perhaps have any outstanding writes, or has >> * the file grown beyond our last write? */ >> - if ((nfsi->npages == 0 && !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->flags)) || >> + if ((nfsi->npages == 0 && !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->flags) && >> + !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITTING, &nfsi->flags)) || >> new_isize > cur_isize) { >> i_size_write(inode, new_isize); >> invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA; > > Ugh. Is there any reason why we can’t just keep NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT set until the layout commit operation is finished instead of multiplying the tests for it in generic NFS code paths such as nfs_update_inode? Actually, no. The above is bogus, because LAYOUTCOMMIT doesn’t just affect the file size: it affects the NFSv4 change attribute, ctime and mtime values too. I’ll draft a patch... -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html