Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] nfsd4: break from inner lookup loop in nfsd4_release_lockowner on first match

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Benny,

On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Otherwise the lockowner may by added to "matches" more than once.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 0874998..b04f765 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -4192,6 +4192,7 @@ alloc_init_lock_stateowner(unsigned int strhashval, struct nfs4_client *clp, str
>         /* It is the openowner seqid that will be incremented in encode in the
>          * case of new lockowners; so increment the lock seqid manually: */
>         lo->lo_owner.so_seqid = lock->lk_new_lock_seqid + 1;
> +       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lo->lo_list);
>         hash_lockowner(lo, strhashval, clp, open_stp);
>         return lo;
>  }
> @@ -4646,7 +4647,6 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
>         if (status)
>                 goto out;
>
> -       status = nfserr_locks_held;
>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&matches);
>
>         list_for_each_entry(sop, &nn->ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
> @@ -4654,25 +4654,30 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
>                         continue;
>                 if (!same_owner_str(sop, owner, clid))
>                         continue;
> +               lo = lockowner(sop);
>                 list_for_each_entry(stp, &sop->so_stateids,
>                                 st_perstateowner) {
> -                       lo = lockowner(sop);
> -                       if (check_for_locks(stp->st_file, lo))
> -                               goto out;
> +                       if (check_for_locks(stp->st_file, lo)) {
> +                               status = nfserr_locks_held;
> +                               goto locks_held;
> +                       }
>                         list_add(&lo->lo_list, &matches);
> +                       break;
If so_stateids is empty, lockowner is skipped. It was skipped before
the patch as well but I guess that need to be fixed, right?

Thanks,
Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux