On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 09:25:09 -0500 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:09:44AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:54:02AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > Are you suggesting that we shouldn't try to bound the cache at all and > > > should instead just let it grow and rely on the shrinker to keep it in > > > check? > > > > Exactly. > > As long as the lookup times stay reasonable.... > That is another tricky question. Currently, we size the number of hash buckets based on the max size of the cache. If we allow it to grow without bound, then how do we determine how many hash buckets we need? -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
