On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 05:09:44 -0800 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:54:02AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > Are you suggesting that we shouldn't try to bound the cache at all and > > should instead just let it grow and rely on the shrinker to keep it in > > check? > > Exactly. Btw, what about the comment that the DRC should be per-client > on top of the file? That also seems like some very low hanging fruit. > Ok, I'll see about spinning up a patchset that does that. We'll also probably want to just allocate entries out of the slabcache in that case, so that'll make things quite a bit simpler. As far as making this a per-client cache...sounds great! Go for it! -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
