On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 02:04:05PM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote: > These patches implement just the SEEK NFS v4.2 operation. WRITE_PLUS is > still under discussion with the IETF after my last series of patches, so I > am holding off on resubmitting until after spec discussion dies down. > > Questions? Comments? Thoughts? > Anna > > Anna Schumaker (3): > NFSD: Update error codes I don't think I got this first patch. > NFSD: Create nfs v4.2 decode ops > NFSD: Implement SEEK I'd like to be reassured the protocol is reasonably stable before we commit this. I haven't been following the ietf wg discussion closely. And this should initially be disabled by default. So, probably either: - Introduce a new NFSD_V4_SEEK option, or - Combine this and NFSD_V4_SECURITY_LABEL and this into a single NFSD_V4_2 option. And recommend "N" for now. Probably the latter I guess, to be consistent with the client. And because otherwise we could end up with an awful lot of config options. --b. > > fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > fs/nfsd/nfsd.h | 2 +- > fs/nfsd/xdr4.h | 16 +++++++++++++++ > include/linux/nfs4.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++--- > 5 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.8.4.2 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
