On 08/11/13 11:22, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 11:19:45AM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> >> >> On 08/11/13 11:17, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 11:10:14AM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08/11/13 10:12, Jeff Layton wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:00:02 -0500 >>>>> Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 08/11/13 08:22, Jeff Layton wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 07:41:32 -0500 >>>>>>> Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 07/11/13 18:05, Chuck Lever wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey mrchuck... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 07/11/13 14:25, Chuck Lever wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Steve- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Steve Dickson <steved@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This new module parameter makes the v4 client >>>>>>>>>>>> use the minimal authentication flavor (AUTH_UNIX) >>>>>>>>>>>> when establishing NFSV4 state and doing the >>>>>>>>>>>> pseudoroot lookup >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The patch description doesn't say, but is this change to work >>>>>>>>>>> around the 15 second GSSD upcall timeout? >>>>>>>>>> Yes. A 15 second delay on every mount due to security that >>>>>>>>>> nobody is requesting is just not good.. IMHO.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> One thing we haven't discussed is reducing the upcall timeout to 5 seconds or less, >>>>>>>>> as a form of immediate relief. 15 seconds is arbitrary, and is onerous even when >>>>>>>>> you expect the mount to work (ie why would it be good for any properly configured >>>>>>>>> environment to take 15 seconds to establish a GSS context?). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In other words, there are still cases where users wait 15 seconds unnecessarily, >>>>>>>>> and not because of the use of krb5i for lease management. Aren't those of concern? >>>>>>>> No. I think the concern here, at least my concern, is the lack of management. >>>>>>>> We are forcing admins to use krb5i in lease management when its not necessary >>>>>>>> and there is no way to turn it off. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think that's really the case. The idea was to have the client >>>>>>> attempt to use krb5i if it's available, and then to fall back to >>>>>>> AUTH_SYS if it isn't. This would be *absolutely* no big deal if the >>>>>>> GSSAPI upcall succeeded or failed immediately instead of requiring this >>>>>>> timeout when the daemon isn't running. >>>>>> What server makes krb5i available today in state setup and pseudoroot lookups? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That I don't know...sorry... >>>> Then what is the justification to take all these extra steps >>>> there they going to fail %100 of the time?? >>> >>> Any server can support krb5 for state setup and pseudoroot operations if >>> it's configured. This isn't a problem. >> Would is this done on a Linux server? Is there a wiki? > > It's allowed by default, there should be nothing to configure beyond the > usual krb5 setup. Great! So you are saying when rpc.gssd is up and Kerberos is correctly configured on both the server and client the state setup and pseudoroot become secured? And this is the case with other non-Linux servers? steved. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
