On Nov 2, 2013, at 6:57, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Currently, we fetch the security label when revalidating an inode's > attributes, but don't apply it. This is in contrast to the readdir() > codepath where we do apply label changes. OK. Why should we not just throw out the code that fetches the security label here? IOW: what is the caching model that is being implemented in this patch; is it just “fetch label at random intervals” or is there real method to the madness? Trond-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
