On Oct 29, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Myklebust, Trond <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linux-nfs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-nfs- >> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chuck Lever >> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:30 PM >> To: Weston Andros Adamson >> Cc: steved@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs.man: add description of multiple sec= options >> >> >> On Oct 29, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Weston Andros Adamson <dros@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> The client now supports multiple sec= options as a colon delimited list. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> utils/mount/nfs.man | 7 ++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/utils/mount/nfs.man b/utils/mount/nfs.man index >>> 2a42b93..17b8d88 100644 >>> --- a/utils/mount/nfs.man >>> +++ b/utils/mount/nfs.man >>> @@ -380,9 +380,10 @@ If a value of zero is specified, the .BR mount >>> (8) command exits immediately after the first failure. >>> .TP 1.5i >>> -.BI sec= flavor >>> -The security flavor to use for accessing files on this mount point. >>> -If the server does not support this flavor, the mount operation fails. >>> +.BI sec= flavors >>> +A colon-delimited list of security flavors to use for accessing files >>> +on this mount point. If the server does not support any of these >>> +flavors, the mount operation fails. >> >> Just a nit: The new text kind of suggests that the colons are required. >> "sec=single flavor" is also still supported. Typically man page language is >> careful to show both. > > How about "colon-separated list of one or more security flavours"? That's less ambiguous than "colon-delimited"… OK, but fwiw I aped that from the exports manpage: sec= The sec= option, followed by a colon-delimited list of security flavors, restricts the export to clients using those flavors. Available security flavors include sys (the default--no crypto‐ … So it: 1) isn’t clear that one flavor is an option. 2) says “colon-delimited" Should we clean this up too? -dros��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w��� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
