Re: [RFC 5/4] NFSD: Add basic CB_OFFLOAD support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:36:11AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Yeah, understood, I'm glad we're not implementing that, I just wonder
> why every one of these operations (COPY, WRITE_PLUS, etc.) has to have
> this asynchronous option.
> 
> The client's still stuck implementing it even if the server does, it's
> extra protocol verbage even if nobody uses it, and I'm not completely
> clear what it's for.

Seems like Trond answered that question: feature creep that people
without the slightest sense of abstraction tried to overload over a few
operations.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux