Re: [PATCH 2/3] NFS: Allow for asynchronous WRITE_PLUS calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Oct 29, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:00:17AM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote:
>> Clients are required to support CB_OFFLOAD for the NFS4_CONTENT_HOLE arm
>> of the WRITE_PLUS union.
> 
> This sounds pretty stupid.  Just curious, who got this braindamage into
> the standard?
> 

It exists because the server vendors were worried that operations such as preallocation and/or hole punching can take a more or less unbounded amount of time due to the 64-bit size. By using an (optional) callback method, the server can free up the RPC slot that would otherwise be kept waiting in the synchronous case.

Cheers
  Trond--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux