On Oct 27, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Simo Sorce <simo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 18:07 +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote: >> On Oct 27, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:31:46PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote: >>>> The NFSv4 working group has no authority to do so. POSIX would be the right address. >>> >>> The complete lack of clue, authority or even defined semantics didn't >>> stop them from defining their ACL model. User extended attributes are >>> harmless compared to that, even if everyone has subtly different >>> flavours. >>> >> >> The user xattrs are in principle harmless. What about "trusted.*"? >> >> BTW: caching any xattrs is a problem. There is no close-to-open model that you can use and neither is there locking. This is already causing a problem for labeled nfs... > > You could start without caching them. > I'm not going to start anything... Trond-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
