On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:23:10AM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On 9/27/13 7:21 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >I have looked at this again, and I still worry that it looks like a bug.
> >(remote security related blah blah blah).
> >
> >regards,
> >dan carpenter
> >
> >On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:50:19PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >>I had a couple questions about some map_read_chunks().
> >>
> >>net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
> >>
> >> 150 ch_bytes = ntohl(ch->rc_target.rs_length);
> >> ^^^^^^^^
> >>It look like this is 32 bits from the network?
> >>
> >> 151 head->arg.head[0] = rqstp->rq_arg.head[0];
> >> 152 head->arg.tail[0] = rqstp->rq_arg.tail[0];
> >> 153 head->arg.pages = &head->pages[head->count];
> >> 154 head->hdr_count = head->count; /* save count of hdr pages */
> >> 155 head->arg.page_base = 0;
> >> 156 head->arg.page_len = ch_bytes;
> >> 157 head->arg.len = rqstp->rq_arg.len + ch_bytes;
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>Can overflow.
> >> 158 head->arg.buflen = rqstp->rq_arg.buflen + ch_bytes;
> agreed.
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>Same. I didn't follow it through to see if an overflow matters. Does
> >>it?
> >>
> >> 159 head->count++;
> >> 160 chl_map->ch[0].start = 0;
> >> 161 while (byte_count) {
> >> 162 rpl_map->sge[sge_no].iov_base =
> >> 163 page_address(rqstp->rq_arg.pages[page_no]) + page_off;
> >> 164 sge_bytes = min_t(int, PAGE_SIZE-page_off, ch_bytes);
> >> ^^^
> >>This is the wrong cast to use. A large ch_bytes would be counted as a
> >>negative value and get around the cap here.
> True, but if we validate the wire data like we should, that's
> probably not an issue.
Well, my last attempt to do rdma nfs io resulted in an instant server
reboot, so I can take a look at this but it may be the least of our
problems....
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
