On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:16:34 -0400 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:04:54PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:19:18 -0400 > > "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:02:44AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:09:24 -0400 > > > > "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 02:59:54AM -0400, Jan Stancek wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > Cc: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bfields@xxxxxxxxxx, "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, 8 July, 2013 10:16:43 PM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: fix NFSv3 with sec=krb5 and CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:32:34PM +0200, Jan Stancek wrote: > > > > > > > > Starting with commit: > > > > > > > > commit f994c43d19a9116727d4c228d3f13db595bff562 > > > > > > > > Author: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Date: Thu Nov 1 12:14:14 2012 -0400 > > > > > > > > SUNRPC: Clean up rpc_bind_new_program > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > operations on directory mounted with -onfsvers=3,tcp,sec=krb5 fail > > > > > > > > with Input/Output error after ~60 second timeout. This is presumably > > > > > > > > because upcalls for 'nfsacl' are not getting anywhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch enables pipe dir for nfsacl_program and changes its name > > > > > > > > to 'nfs'. This name will be used in upcalls and whole setup should > > > > > > > > work as it did in past - just with nfs/hostname principal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this was the problem that nfs-utils commits > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a1f8afc560 gssd: Remove insane sanity checks of the service name > > > > > > > a56989b665 gssd: Handle the target name correctly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > were supposed to fix? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But perhaps the kernel needs a fix too to fix a regression with old > > > > > > > userspace. > > > > > > > > > > > > I saw this error with nfs-utils.1.2.9-rc1, which should already contain > > > > > > those 2 commits. > > > > > > > > > > Actually, I think your patch is just a subset of Trond's > > > > > http://mid.gmane.org/<4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA9092EC392@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Trond, is there a reason that never got applied? > > > > > > > > > > --b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm...gmane just says "No such article" when I feed it the above URL. > > > > Do you know what the title of the email was? > > > > > > Argh sorry hadn't noticed that was private mail. > > > > > > Last I checked actually neither of these patches fixed v3/krb5 for me. > > > > > > --b. > > > > > > Here is v2 with appropriate service names for mountd, statd, etc. > > > > > > > > > > Ok, I tested both this patch and Jan's. This one doesn't help at all, > > but Jan's does seem to fix the problem. I'm still looking over the > > kernel and userland code to determine whether it's the best fix or > > not... > > Ah, crap, sorry, I missed that Jan's modified rpc_program.name and > Trond's rpc_program.service_name. > > As Simo pointed out in irc yesterday this can't be right: > > > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c > > > index 909dc0c..b19dab8 100644 > > > --- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c > > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c > > > @@ -403,7 +403,9 @@ static void gss_encode_v1_msg(struct gss_upcall_msg *gss_msg, > > > gss_msg->uid); > > > p += gss_msg->msg.len; > > > if (clnt->cl_principal) { > > > - len = sprintf(p, "target=%s ", clnt->cl_principal); > > > + len = sprintf(p, "target=%s@%s ", > > > + clnt->cl_program->service_name, > > > + clnt->cl_principal); > > I'd think this should instead be going in the "service_name" field, but > I'm not sure. > The service= field is...ahem...weird. It seems to also signal that you want to use machine creds, and clearly if you're a regular old user you don't want to be doing that. I've been able to get Trond's patch to work, but had to also couple it with the patch below. Part of the problem seems to have been that the nfsacl client isn't getting a rpc_pipe dir instantiated because pipe_dir_name isn't set (as Jan's patch also points out). We could just as easily stick this in the "nfs" directory though. Thoughts? 8<--------------------------------------------------------------- >From 3a181b99f7b01fff0c7d0412910c374fc2ebcdfd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:17:08 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] rpc_pipe: add nfsacl subdir For the gssd file for nfsacl. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfs/nfs3client.c | 1 + net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs3client.c b/fs/nfs/nfs3client.c index 20b3693..5dc6bf0 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs3client.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs3client.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ const struct rpc_program nfsacl_program = { .nrvers = ARRAY_SIZE(nfsacl_version), .version = nfsacl_version, .stats = &nfsacl_rpcstat, + .pipe_dir_name = "nfsacl", }; /* diff --git a/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c b/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c index 83b196d..42ce94c 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c @@ -1015,6 +1015,7 @@ enum { RPCAUTH_lockd, RPCAUTH_mount, RPCAUTH_nfs, + RPCAUTH_nfsacl, RPCAUTH_portmap, RPCAUTH_statd, RPCAUTH_nfsd4_cb, @@ -1036,6 +1037,10 @@ static const struct rpc_filelist files[] = { .name = "nfs", .mode = S_IFDIR | S_IRUGO | S_IXUGO, }, + [RPCAUTH_nfsacl] = { + .name = "nfsacl", + .mode = S_IFDIR | S_IRUGO | S_IXUGO, + }, [RPCAUTH_portmap] = { .name = "portmap", .mode = S_IFDIR | S_IRUGO | S_IXUGO, -- 1.8.3.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
