On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 11:59 -0400, andros@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> pNFS data servers are not mounted in the normal sense as there is no associated
> nfs_server structure.
>
> Commit 4edaa308 "NFS: Use "krb5i" to establish NFSv4 state whenever possible"
> uses the nfs_client cl_rpcclient for all state management operations, and
> will use krb5i or auth_sys with no regard to the mount command authflavor
> choice. For normal mounted servers, the nfs_server client authflavor is used
> for all non-state management operations
>
> Data servers use the same authflavor as the MDS mount for non-state management
> operations. Note that the MDS has performed any sub-mounts and created an
> nfs_server rpc client. Add an array of struct rpc_clnt to struct
> nfs_client, one for each possible auth flavor for data server RPC connections.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx>
Question: do we also need to add support for SECINFO_NO_NAME? IIRC, the
spec says that we do.
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx
www.netapp.com
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w��� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
