On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 12:42 -0400, andros@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> As per RFC 3530 and RFC 5661 Security Considerations.
>
> Commit 4edaa308 "NFS: Use "krb5i" to establish NFSv4 state whenever possible"
> uses the nfs_client cl_rpcclient for all clientid management operations.
Why? From a security perspective, how is this any different from doing a
READLINK, for instance?
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx
www.netapp.com
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w��� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
