On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 12:40 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:05:10PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > static inline unsigned short rpc_get_port(const struct sockaddr *sap)
> > {
> > - switch (sap->sa_family) {
> > - case AF_INET:
> > - return ntohs(((struct sockaddr_in *)sap)->sin_port);
> > - case AF_INET6:
> > - return ntohs(((struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap)->sin6_port);
> > - }
> > - return 0;
> > + return inet_addr_get_port((const union inet_addr *)sap);
> > }
>
> Is there any reason to keep the rpc_get_port wrapper at all after this?
> Or if its still useful to have the convenience of not having to do the
> cast, maybe the wrapper should move to common code to? (Is there some
> reason only the rpc code needs this?)
>
Yeah, the only reason why I keep it is that I don't want to touch all
the callers of rpc_get_port(). I agree that we can make it a generic
function.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
