From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> We again check for the EXDEV a little later on, so the first check is redundant. This check is also slightly racier, since a badly timed eviction from the export cache could leave us with the two fh_export pointers pointing to two different cache entries which each refer to the same underlying export. It's better to compare vfsmounts as the later check does, but that leaves a minor security hole in the case where the two exports refer to two different directories especially if (for example) they have different root-squashing options. So, compare ex_path.dentry too. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Committing for 3.10 if nobody sees a problem with this approach. --b. diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c index 2b2e239..84ce601 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c @@ -1758,10 +1758,6 @@ nfsd_rename(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *ffhp, char *fname, int flen, tdentry = tfhp->fh_dentry; tdir = tdentry->d_inode; - err = (rqstp->rq_vers == 2) ? nfserr_acces : nfserr_xdev; - if (ffhp->fh_export != tfhp->fh_export) - goto out; - err = nfserr_perm; if (!flen || isdotent(fname, flen) || !tlen || isdotent(tname, tlen)) goto out; @@ -1802,6 +1798,8 @@ nfsd_rename(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *ffhp, char *fname, int flen, host_err = -EXDEV; if (ffhp->fh_export->ex_path.mnt != tfhp->fh_export->ex_path.mnt) goto out_dput_new; + if (ffhp->fh_export->ex_path.dentry != tfhp->fh_export->ex_path.dentry) + goto out_dput_new; host_err = nfsd_break_lease(odentry->d_inode); if (host_err) -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
