Re: sunrpc/cache.c: races while updating cache entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05 Apr 2013 23:09:00 +0100 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:33:49PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> > On 05 Apr 2013 14:40:00 +0100 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 07:59:35PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> > > > There is no reason for apologies. The thread meanwhile seems to be a bit
> > > > confusing :-)
> > > > 
> > > > Current state is:
> > > > 
> > > > - Neil Brown has created two series of patches. One for SLES11-SP1 and a
> > > >   second one for -SP2
> > > > 
> > > > - AFAICS, the series for -SP2 will match with mainline also.
> > > > 
> > > > - Today I found and fixed the (hopefully) last problem in the -SP1 series.
> > > >   My test using this patchset will run until Monday.
> > > > 
> > > > - Provided the test on SP1 succeeds, probably on Tuesday I'll start to test
> > > >   the patches for SP2 (and mainline). If it runs fine, we'll have a tested
> > > >   patchset not later than Mon 15th.
> > > 
> > > OK, great, as long as it hasn't just been forgotten!
> > > 
> > > I'd also be curious to understand why we aren't getting a lot of
> > > complaints about this from elsewhere....  Is there something unique
> > > about your setup?  Do the bugs that remain upstream take a long time to
> > > reproduce?
> > > 
> > > --b.
> > > 
> > 
> > It's no secret, what we are doing. So let me try to explain:
> 
> Thanks for the detailed explanation!  I'll look forward to the patches.
> 
> --b.
> 

Let me give an intermediate result:

The test of the -SP1 patch series succeeded.

We started the test of the -SP2 (and mainline) series on Tue, 9th, but had no
success.
We did _not_ find a problem with the patches, but under -SP2 our test scenario
has less than 40% of the throughput we saw under -SP1. With that low
performance, we had a 4 day run without any dropped RPC request. But we don't
know the error rate without the patches under these conditions. So we can't
give an o.k. for the patches yet.

Currently we try to find the reason for the different behavior of SP1 and SP2

Bodo
ÿôèº{.nÇ+?·?®?­?+%?Ëÿ±éݶ¥?wÿº{.nÇ+?·¥?{±þwìþ)í?æèw*jg¬±¨¶????Ý¢jÿ¾«þG«?éÿ¢¸¢·¦j:+v?¨?wèjØm¶?ÿþø¯ù®w¥þ?àþf£¢·h??â?úÿ?Ù¥





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux