On 25/03/13 19:36, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 05:27:36PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 04:22:21PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 25/03/13 14:13, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:32:29AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >>>>> commit 8e2fb3fc cause a regression in mount export >>>>> that are on different local file system. >>>>> Exports like (all on different filesystems) >>>>> >>>>> /home *(rw,fsid=0,crossmnt) >>>>> /home/fs1 *(rw,crossmnt) >>>>> /home/fs1/fs2/fs3 *(rw,nohide) >>>>> >>>>> and then a mount of the root 'mount /home /mnt' >>>>> would end up mounting /home/fs1/fs2/fs3 not /home >>>> >>>> That's strange. >>> Yeah... I had this guy reporting from day one that the >>> latest nfs-utils broke his export world... >>> >>>> >>>>> Reverting the logic of commit 8e2fb3fc until >>>>> a better solution can be found for the original >>>>> problem. >>>> >>>> I can't figure out why the patch below would help. The only change I >>>> can see is to the way that an export of "/" would be handled. >>> The reason I didn't debug this further was I did not know how to >>> reproduce the original problem the patch was trying to fix... >> >> Could you remind me where the bug report for this is? > > Oh, right, it was https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909882 > > I'm not seeing why you think this helps. Because it does... ;-) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909882#c10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4396/nfs-utils-1.2.7-5.fc18 What I would like to is how to reproduce the original problem so we can fix it without creating this regression.... steved. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
