We definitely do need a 4.2 minor version label. As you said, that shouldn't be hard since 4.2 is basically 4.1 with new enhancements, and we already have all the minorversion machinery ready and working. > -----Original Message----- > From: J. Bruce Fields [mailto:bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 6:11 PM > To: Steve Dickson > Cc: Myklebust, Trond; J. Bruce Fields; David P. Quigley; Linux NFS list; Linux FS > devel list; Linux Security List; SELinux List > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] lnfs: 3.8-rc6 release > > So originally I thought Dave was saying we'd try to get the label change > attribute in the initial submission. I guess it'll be coming later instead? > > This is going to be a part of NFSv4.2, so shouldn't this really come with > patches to implement minor version 2? (Should be totally trivial as it doesn't > have to do anything other than labeled NFS for now.) > > If not, that's another reason why we don't want to recommend building this > by default. Though maybe advertising labeled NFS support in v4.1 won't > cause a problem for any implementation in practice, I don't know. > > --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
