On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 08:40 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > From: David Quigley <dpquigl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > There is a time where we need to calculate a context without the > inode having been created yet. To do this we take the negative dentry and > calculate a context based on the process and the parent directory contexts. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew N. Dodd <Matthew.Dodd@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Miguel Rodel Felipe <Rodel_FM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Phua Eu Gene <PHUA_Eu_Gene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Khin Mi Mi Aung <Mi_Mi_AUNG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/security.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > security/capability.c | 8 ++++++++ > security/security.c | 10 ++++++++++ > security/selinux/hooks.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+) Linus won't accept a patch that changes the security code from Bruce or myself without acks from the security maintainers. I assume that means we need to get at least an ack from James Morris, and then possibly Stephen and Eric too... -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx www.netapp.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
