On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:00:48AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> OK, that settles it. WARN_ON() and printks in the area can be dropped;
> the right fix is below. However, there's a similar place in cifs that
> also needs to be dealt with and I really, really wonder why the hell do
> we do d_drop() in nfs_revalidate_lookup(). It's not relevant in this
> bug, but I would like to understand what's wrong with simply returning
> 0 from ->d_revalidate() and letting the caller (in fs/namei.c) take care
> of unhashing, etc. itself. Would make have_submounts() in there pointless
> as well - we could just return 0 and let d_invalidate() take care of the
> checks... Trond?
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
> @@ -450,7 +450,8 @@ void nfs_prime_dcache(struct dentry *parent, struct nfs_entry *entry)
> nfs_refresh_inode(dentry->d_inode, entry->fattr);
> goto out;
> } else {
> - d_drop(dentry);
> + if (d_invalidate(dentry) != 0)
> + goto out;
> dput(dentry);
> }
> }
Hello,
With your previous patch (with the WARN_ON), I hit the WARN_ON() in the
test case described here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1446851/ .
The __d_move()ing mountpoint case no longer hits, and there is no longer
an EBUSY, so this seems to work for me (in 3.6, where it broke).
Simon-
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
