Re: hang problem when umount a nfs point

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/11/8 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:03:22AM +0800, Jack Wang wrote:
>> 2012/11/8 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:05:51AM +0800, Jack Wang wrote:
>> >> 2012/11/7 Martín Cigorraga <msx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Jack Wang <jack.wang.usish@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi all,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Anyone who can kindly give some suggestion? or we just put question to
>> >> >> the wrong list?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jack
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2012/11/1 dahai_tian <dahai_tian@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> >> >> > Hi all:
>> >> >> >         I mount a local directory to a nfs server. When nfs server is
>> >> >> > stopped
>> >> >> > for some accidental cause, I try to umount the mount point, the umount
>> >> >> > command will hang and 'time out' messages are continually printed in the
>> >> >> > terminal. How can I avoid hanging in this case? BTW, This issue does not
>> >> >> > exist when I changed nfs version from 4 to 3.
>> >> >> >         Look forward to your response, thanks!
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi Jack, use the -l (lazy) switch:
>> >> > # umount -l {your mounted nfs share}
>> >> >
>> >> > Also, I wouldn't recommend 'just to kill' the NFS proces(ses) as it (them)
>> >> > may leave shared memory a mess.
>> >> > (And I would like to see how do you make to mount any NFS share again
>> >> > without booting)
>> >>
>> >> Thanks Martin for kindly help.
>> >>
>> >> umount -l did work, but why nfsv3 do not have this problem?
>> >
>> > I don't know what it is exactly.  But in general I wouldn't expect
>> > umount to work when the server's unavailable.
>> >
>> > --b.
>>
>> Thanks for your time Bruce, but there are chance the server
>> unavailable , why you think umount don't work is expected?
>
> It's tough for the client to deal safely with an unreachable server.
> Worst case it may still have data in its buffers that applications have
> written but that hasn't yet made it to the server.
>
> If you don't have any opens or other state on the filesystem any more,
> there might be things that could be done to make it easier to umount in
> that case--I haven't thought it through--but I doubt that's a high
> priority, so it's likely up to you to write the code and persuade people
> it's worthwhile.
>
> --b.
Thanks for explaination.

Jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux