On 26 Oct 2012, Theodore Ts'o stated: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:37:08PM +0100, Nix wrote: >> >> I can reproduce this on a small filesystem and stick the image somewhere >> if that would be of any use to anyone. (If I'm very lucky, merely making >> this offer will make the problem go away. :} ) > > I'm not sure the image is going to be that useful. What we really > need to do is to get a reliable reproduction of what _you_ are seeing. > > It's clear from Eric's experiments that journal_checksum is dangerous. > > That's why one of the things I asked you to do when you had time was > to see if you could reproduce the problem you are seeing w/o > nobarrier,journal_checksum,journal_async_commit. OK. Will do tomorrow. > The other experiment that would be really useful if you could do is to > try to apply these two patches which I sent earlier this week: > > [PATCH 1/2] ext4: revert "jbd2: don't write superblock when if its empty > [PATCH 2/2] ext4: fix I/O error when unmounting an ro file system > > ... and see if they make a difference. As of tomorrow I'll be able to reboot without causing a riot: I'll test it then. (Sorry for the delay :( ) > So I really don't want > to push these patches to Linus until I get confirmation that they make > a difference to *somebody*. Agreed. This isn't the first time that journal_checksum has proven problematic. It's a shame that we're stuck between two error-inducing stools here... -- NULL && (void) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
