On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 02:44:19PM +0800, ycnian@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Yanchuan Nian <ycnian@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The object type in the cache of lockowner_slab is wrong, and it is better to fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanchuan Nian <ycnian@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index cc894ed..1609eb2 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -2325,7 +2325,7 @@ nfsd4_init_slabs(void)
> if (openowner_slab == NULL)
> goto out_nomem;
> lockowner_slab = kmem_cache_create("nfsd4_lockowners",
> - sizeof(struct nfs4_openowner), 0, 0, NULL);
> + sizeof(struct nfs4_lockowner), 0, 0, NULL);
Thanks!
The first three fields of each are the same, the rest is:
struct nfs4_openowner {
...
pointer
time_t
unsigned char
}
struct nfs4_lockowner {
...
struct list_head
}
Is it always true that
sizeof(struct nfs4_openowner) >= sizeof9struct nfs4_lockowner)
? I think so, in which case this isn't urgent.... Applying for 3.8.
--b.
> if (lockowner_slab == NULL)
> goto out_nomem;
> file_slab = kmem_cache_create("nfsd4_files",
> --
> 1.7.4.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
